So in other words, you have posted again. We get itAs the current post has reached the 200 comments, we have started a new post just for new comments, and have kicked it off with this one:
You really don't. Trust me.Textusa21 Apr 2018, 10:56:00We usually get our help from Insane.
Of course you did.This time we got it from the Meerkat.
We direct so many people in your direction that you shut the place down. Yes, I see how that worksWe encourage both to continue as not only on occasion they drop a useful gem from time to time, as the more they say they dislike the more they direct sensible and reasonable people in our direction.
Again.....The more the naysayer’s say about us the more people want to read what we say.
And what a help Meerkat’s comment was this time!
It doesn't take much, does it?So much so that it may have made us change our minds about the scenario at the moment when Maddie died by accident on May 3 2007.
This is the one you changed from someone delivering a back-hander to the child to shut her up when you were informed that it wouldn't be 'accidental death'We maintain the physics of our prior scenario: as the result of the escalation of a heated argument an adult pushed by another adult fell on Maddie standing on the couch this projected her against the side-wall and breaking her neck. The distance of projection was too great to be justified by a domestic accident of Maddie falling off the couch.
Of course he hasWhat Meerkat has done was to make us change the reason why we think David Payne was in the apartment.
Oh really? Do tell.....Meerkat has made us see that it was much more directly related with the VIP swinging than we had initially presumed.
He isn'tThe help came in a form of a tweet:https://twitter.com/2for1Tickets/status/984753113058988032
“aleksandr orlov @2for1Tickets
Replying to @xxMichelleSxx
I'd once likened coitus with K as like having it off with a folded deckchair! Nooo! But swinging is so trivial since forever! In the scheme of things it's like photocopying one's bottom at the office party. I knew you had a tribe in there as I saw you sneaking tapas into it...
4:20 am - 13 Apr 2018”Why is Meerkat putting down Kate McCann’s physical appearance?
Most people don’t like her and we would even say that the remainder left out of the ‘most’ loathe her.
If you say soBut this dislike or loathing is because of her personality, her public demeanour on all those occasions we have been forced to watch knowing she knows exactly what happened to her dead daughter and continues to pretend and portray that ridiculous role of the mother of a missing child. Missing isn’t untrue, it only becomes that when we know that they want us to believe that it means abduction.We all know she wasn’t and we all know she knows. That is why she’s not liked/loathed.
He didn't actually make any comment on her attractiveness or lack of it. He commented on her physicality and from an entirely personal perspective. Some people don't like that bony, sinewy thing she has going on.If one abstains from that, if one can, it cannot be said that Kate McCann is a physically unattractive woman. On the contrary, on May 2007 she was a very attractive woman. And even though she has aged more rapidly than would be expected for evident reasons, we would say she remains to be, we repeat, physically an attractive woman.
He wasn't.So why is Meerkat putting her looks down? Why was Meerkat making the contrary of the obvious as if it was obvious?
And he is the thing. There is a difference between attractiveness and desireability. Many people might concede that her features are reasonably attractive whilst finding absolutely nothing about her remotely desirable.One only does that if one wants to hide the obvious because that obvious is a liability. The obvious being Kate McCann being a physically desirable woman.
Again, beauty and sexual attractiveness are not the same thing. Nor do they mean the same thing to each person, which is just as well, otherwise some people would simply never get any. For example, let's take your good self. You may be a stunningly beautiful person, for all I know, but you would never be remotely desirable on account of having the personality of an utter shitgibbon. Do you see my point?Meerkat, by putting down Kate’s possible sexual attractiveness was just doing his best to make people feel have in the back of their mind that she was physically undesirable.
In your opinion; an opinion not shared by othersDoing that told us that the fact that Kate McCann was indeed desirable was a perception people shouldn't have because it would be inconvenient for the truth. But, physically, we don't think that it's even arguable that in 2007 she was a desirable woman.
Why - because the tweeter in question would rather hump a dogleg table than shag Kate McCann?So, this what we propose happened.
Even though you have been telling people for years 'what happened' and forgetting to mention that it's just your fuckwitted theory.Note, all speculation a possibility that we leave for readers to consider. Only Kate McCann and David Payne can say what happened and why.
uh huhWe now say that David Payne was not there for sex for himself. He went into that apartment to speak to Kate to concerning arrangements for the swinging that was to take place that night.
Which VIP would that be? Can we have a list of all these VIPs who were staying at the Ocean Club?Kate was an attractive woman who had been that week, shall we say, popular in the swinging parties and some VIP may have requested to David for her presence that night.
Er, you do realise that your theory was supposed to be 'Swinging'. Not "Pimp out my mate's wives"?David enters to inform Kate that her presence is required at VIP XXXX’s ‘little party’ at villa ‘RFGDR’ that night, tells her that he has informed XXXX that she would be there.But Kate may have had other plans, for example, she had been requested to attend another event, with VIP YYYY at villa ‘OKJLU’, which she had already agreed to attend.The argument started about which party she should attend. Neither wanting to lose face could agree to lose face to their ‘respective’ VIP.
This is all gripping stuff, isn't it, readers? 😅We would say that the argument went around which party she had to attend, which one brought more serious consequences by refusing. She probably stood her ground and David was not pleased. The argument escalated rapidly and the accident happened.
You know, I can't see anyone pushing Kate McCann and living to tell the tale. We all know what she can do to a bed that displeasesTo those saying that this may not be reason enough for someone to get angry and to lash out at someone or push them, arguments between civilised people are never planned to involve any sort of violence – pushing is a violent act – but when things escalate rapidly people do things they regret and we don’t know the importance were the reasons each of them felt for not standing down in the argument.
Remind us who those VIPs are again?Note, that in this scenario, things are even more connected to the VIP swinging than we have proposed up to here, in which David just wanted some and Kate turns him down.
Ah - so a small Portuguese fishing village is now the international hotbed (literally) of jetset swinging? Who would have thunk it?As there was no way to explain how Maddie could have died because of a domestic accident and they were FULLY AWARE that David’s presence there was indeed related with the VIP swinging event that was going on Luz and VIPs XXXX and YYYY in particular.
Just remind me how the VIPs would have been damaged by the consequences of a scrap between two middle-ranking Leicestershire doctors?That mindset made them and everyone else conscious of the need for a story to protect the reputation of the VIPs present.
Au naturellement!Note, in this proposed scenario, the children’s presence is irrelevant. They could be in the apartment or not. David could have known or not that they were there and most likely he didn’t lose a moment thinking about the children.What was to be discussed – which party was to be attended – could be perfectly well discussed in the presence of the children.
Was it? Was it really?The fictitious tennis court talk between Gerry and David was needed as we explained in the post: Gerry’s permission for David to be in that apartment was needed.
Except he was, and there are witnessesGerry, most likely was far away from the apartment and certainly not at the tennis courts.
Thank you, Meerkat. Good job. Please continue.On our part, as promised, we continue to intervene in the case.
Well, I wish you would make your mind up. Have you retired or have you not?