Translate

Monday, 5 March 2018

Oh dear, oh dear.........


With her usual ill-grace, the mad cow has had to eat a large slice of humble pie

We have said that when one is shown to be wrong and the mistake was out of ignorance, one should be happy to correct one’s hand because one has been enlightened.

When one is shown one is wrong and the mistake was because one was indeed mistaken, one only has to be happy for having been shown the opportunity to correct the path one is treading.

That said, we inform our readers that we have now concluded that Anon we have mentioned repeatedly in the post, is not Insane.
Well, I did tell you that, but you took no notice 

We have come to the conclusion from Anon’s comments after the post was published.

Credit has to be given to Anon who stood his ground and showed us to be wrong. From what we understood Anon is someone who believes in the COMARE theory.

We have now corrected the post accordingly.

We have now published a Post Scriptum to the post where we have shown what we have corrected.

As we say in that Post Scriptum, the post’s message is not altered in any way: Insane in his Walkercan1000 and Not Textusa has, and is, executing and paedo offensive with the objective of pressuring the establishment paedophilia into action to stop the truth about Maddie from emerging.
Oh yes - this is your barking mad theory that secreted away on the comments page of a little-read blog is the ideal place to threaten establishment figures. Snort 

As always, in pursuit in the truth and as always, correcting ourselves when we see that we are wrong.
Liar 

We have to live with our consciences and persisting in error out of pride or stubbornness is not our way of living life.
You're going to have a lot of apologising to do when the penny drops that I'm not himself, aren't you?  

Lastly, we would like to thank Anon for having corrected us.

Our sincerest apology is to him for linking his name to such an objectionable character.
Why on earth anyone would believe I had penned such drooling, inarticulate nonsense is beyond me 

Of course, she couldn't leave it there, she had to go back and rewrite her nonsense:


 POST SCRIPTUM:

As we have recognised in our comment at 5 Mar 2018, 18:50:00, we have mistaken Anon for Insane.

As we strive only for truth and enjoy feeling comfortable with our consciences we had to correct the post accordingly-

Its message is not altered in any way: Insane in his Walkercan1000 and Not Textusa has, and is, executing and paedo offensive with the objective of pressuring the establishment paedophilia into action to stop the truth about Maddie from emerging.

What an absolute load of old bollocks 
For historic reasons, we will put here what we have changed in the post:


On #9. Insane and Anon

The original:

“And that decisive help came when he decided to comment as “Anon” in our blog, in our post from last week.”

Was corrected to this:

“And that decisive help came when an “Anon” decided to comment in our blog, in our post from last week.”

********

The original:

“But then Anon/Insane doesn’t want to make any sense. He just wants to send a very clear message.”

Was corrected to this:

 “But then Anon didn’t seem to us want to make any sense. He just wanted to send a very clear message.”

********

The original:

“And with this comment he makes things clearer by putting a name to those powerful paedos he is threatening: the “establishment paedophilia”.”

Was corrected to this:

“And with this comment Anon makes things clearer by putting a name to those powerful paedos Insane was threatening: the “establishment paedophilia”.”


On #10. Why is Anon Insane?

The original:

“10. Why is Anon Insane?”

Was corrected to this:

“10. Is Anon Insane?”

********

The original:

“Could that be more Insane/Not Textusa/Walkercan1000? No, it couldn’t.

That told us that Insane was trying something on.

Joining this with what Anon – now knowing that he was Anon/Insane – had said about the establishment paedophilia with all Not Textusa had blogged against this paedophilia under the guise of attacking Crsitobell and with Walkercan1000’s tweets against Hill and the Brit immigrants, we could see that all was but an offensive against the establishment paedophilia on Insane’s part.

Now the reader can understand why we replied to the above with the following:”

Was corrected to this:

“Could that be more Insane/Not Textusa/Walkercan1000? No, it couldn’t.

But he wasn’t. We had every reason to believe he was. The fact that when we were writing the post he did not reply to our 28 questions, the fact that when we contradicted his statement that the establishment only communicates with the same level people offline and don’t use social media, he also hadn’t reacted, his reference to the “establishment paedophilia” during Insane’s paedo offensive and the typical Insane one word answer above all made us believe that Anon was Insane.

But, after publication of this post, we have come to realise that Anon is someone who believes in the known as the COMARE one, which we strongly disagree with. Now is not the time to explain in detail why we disagree but can say we fail to see how any secret dealings at government level, nuclear or otherwise, could be used to hide the death of a little girl by drawing attention to that same death, nor are we able to see how a death that did not implicate in any way the government, nor was the government involved in the death, would the government bend back to comply to any sort of threat that was related to that death.

But, that is what the Anon believes in and we must respect.

Anon not being Insane does not make unreal Insane’s unnecessary Malinka reference, his attack on Hill, his attack on the British immigrants and his attack on the establishment paedophilia via his vicious and abhorrent attack on Cristobell.

Anon not being Insane does not make unreal the Insane’s unnecessary Malinka reference, the attack on Hill, the attack on the British immigrants and the attack on the establishment paedophilia when attacking Cristobell.

Insane had laid out the dots and Anon was the thread that helped us connect them.

Joining what Anon had said about the establishment paedophilia with all Not Textusa had blogged against this paedophilia under the guise of attacking Cristobell and with Walkercan1000’s tweets against Hill and the Brit immigrants, we were able to see that all was but an offensive against the establishment paedophilia on Insane’s part.

Now the reader can understand why, thinking that Anon was Insane, we replied to the above with the following:”


On #11. Insane and messaging

The original:

“Lastly, Insane’s 3rd  comment as Anon:” 

Was corrected to this:

“Lastly, Anon’s (who we wrongly thought to be Insane) 3rd  comment:”

********

The original: 

“As the reader has hopefully realised by now Insane wants to threaten the establishment paedophilia into action and he only has social media with which he can do it.

The message above is him saying exactly that. That is what he has and that is what he’s using. He’s a minion, he has no other means but by golly, he’s using it.

Insane as Walkercan1000, as Not Textusa and now as Anon has put the foot down on the paedophilia pedal and floored it, he’s going full gas.”

Was corrected to this:

“As the reader has hopefully realised by now is that we had figured out that Insane wanted to threaten the establishment paedophilia into action and he only has social media with which he could do it.

Anon had helped us, unwittingly, get our ideas straight.

Social media is all Insane has and that is what he’s using. He’s a minion, he has no other means but by golly, he’s using it.

Insane as Walkercan1000 and as Not Textusa has put the foot down on the paedophilia pedal and floored it, he’s going full gas.”


On #12. Silencing Insane

The original:

“This was in the middle of the Cristobell blogging and before he came on our blog as Anon/Insane.”

Was corrected to this:

This was in the middle of the Cristobell blogging and before we mistook Anon for Insane.


All deeply amusing.

However, I notice the cowardly bitch has completely ignored the challenge I made to her to explain exactly why she thinks I am Michael Walker.

It's quite obviously, Textusa, that you have run away rather than face that challenge because you have no response.

Once a fraud, always a fraud. And they don't come much more fraudulent than you, dear. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Leave a message. If you're a conspiraloon, we might publish it, but we reserve the right to take the piss mercilessly. Have a nice day.