From Brain of Britain, Nuala, comes the following
Not Textusa" AKA Insane most certainly IS defending the McCanns. He defends the McCanns by being offensive to Textusa because Textusa is the one person really getting to the truth about what happened to Madeleine McCann. Insane gets particularly upset when Textusa shows that a wider group was involved in the cover up, for example her posts about the manipulated booking sheets:
Is that really your measure of whether someone is a McCann supporter or not - their attitude to Textusa?
You know, Textusa declaring that something is ''irrefutable proof'' does not make it so. She has you and all her other little followers dangling on a string. It's quite amusing to watch.
So let's get this quite clear. Textusa is just a blogger. She is not ''getting to the truth'' as you like to fondly imagine. She pinned her colours to the swinging mast a long time ago and she was wrong. But instead of re-evaluating and admitting her error she basically dragged a load of simpletons along for the ride, then pulled up the drawbridge and bricked you all up in the castle.
I actually described you as brighter than the average Textaloon. Evidently, that still doesn't make you very bright.