I am going to answer these questions over here, rather than have that jackbooted retard censoring them every five minutes.
So anyway, an idiot writes:
To Insane.Human 'soul'?
can you confirm that a human soul had been within 5a Ocean Club apartments
I don't believe there is a test for detecting 'souls'. Perhaps you know of one?
and if it was not Madeleine, who died in or was placed in that area to "create the Odours"?How the fuck do I know? What is it with you people that you think you are entitled to demand answers to the unanswerable?
All of that is complete bollocks. Firstly, what is your issue with the pillowcase, or are we now all supposed to believe an FSS scientist and a police officer faked that too?
Fact, 15 out of 19 indicators with Four unobtainable indicators states a match of nearly 80% to the DNA given by the parents of Madeleine from her pillow case, allegedly from the home she lived in the UK, so that gives a 1 in 5 indicator that the DNA did not belong to Madeleine!?
Secondly, this 15 of 19 statistic that noted Canadian fence artist Heidi Halfwit tries to bamboozle you with is completely fraudulent. The sample yielded 37 markers from at least three different individuals, 15 of which matched markers in Madeleine's profile, as one would expect in a sample procured from a vehicle used by both her parents - yes, the sample came from the car, not the apartment. The 1 in 5 statistic is completely meaningless and bogus
I suggested secondary contamination. There is no ''admitting'' to be had. Secondary contamination means by something other than the deceased, you dingbat. The dogs alerted to items such as clothing and the cuddlecat toy. They were carried in the car. QED secondary contamination. It's not difficult.
You admit "Secondary contamination in the car"So who contaminated the "Odours to the vehicle if it was not Madeleine?
How the fuck should I know?
If Madeleine has passed away, why was the Find Madeleine fund set up by Legal Experts from the UK?
Probably not the ones your little heart desired, but that's just tough.
Hope you can provide answers Insane or Not Textusa.
Anonymous25 Jun 2015, 09:13:00
Ah. Still-struggling anon.
You said that last time
Oh well if you're sure, why are you asking me?
Predicted. And how is it broken down? And do you know what that actually means?
Yeah - that's not a study, dear
No I can provide a study where dogs have signalled odour after a year, but I won't bother because you won't read it. If you had read the carpet squares study by Oesterhelweg et al you would know that study already answers the question for the time period we are dealing with here.
Anonymous25 Jun 2015, 11:36:00
Really? And that's without waiting for, or reading, any of my replies. Remarkable.....
Oh yes? How do you work that out?
Wouldn't need to if it was a primary source, would it? Anyway, keep going.....
Oh don't sell yourself short. Probably.
No - who suggested that?
Secondary contamination, dear. Do try to keep up.
Secondary contamination of cadaver odour, potentially. See, you got there, eventually.
I sent Textusa the link to this page. She took it upon herself to instead copy all the answers over, after she had fiddled about with them.
Then came this
McCann supporter? Where?
As Textusa knows, I am not a McCann supporter. All I am interested in is the truth.
Well dear, the day you share YOUR sources for your various claims is the day you have the right to demand sources from others. I sent you sources last week. You not only could not be bothered to read them, you declared that I hadn't read them either. Daft bitch.
A bit like your claims about what happened to Maddie, or the lack of a big round table?
I don't shoot disruptors. I have only ever withheld one post for the use of a particular obscenity I refuse to allow. However, it's clear you remove 'disruptors', ie anyone who disagrees with you, because of the lack of cogency of your argument.
You are working terribly hard on this ''holiday'', Textusa.