Well, it's that time again. The mad old fool, feeling a little fragile after being comprehensively taken to the cleaners by the brighter amongst you, is spinning like an ant trapped in a CD player.
So let's have a look, shall we?
I should mention before we start that I have, as usual, reset all her bold text and also removed the underlining which she has taken to using to indicate, one assumes, even more emphasis.
I have also removed all the bold text she applied to the poster she quoted. I think it was especially rude of her to go through his post applying her own emphasis to it. I am quite sure he was capable of doing so himself, had he found himself afflicted with the same OCD, so she can fuck that for a game of soldiers.
Blue = Textusa
BLUF: If Maddie's death had anything to do with paedophilia then Maddie would have to have been a victim of a nepiophile. In turn, nepiophilia is absolutely incompatible with any sort of cover-up.
In our post “Speed”, we received the following comment:
“Anonymous 15 Apr 2014 19:42:00
I don’t subscribe your swinging theory. It makes sense, it’s possible and I agree it would warrant a cover-up. I happen to think there’s something greater to cover-up than swinging: paedophilia.
You have called it a Stink Bomb and I’m curious about your explanations why you think that.
I don’t think it’s a Stink Bomb at all and think it’s the big secret behind the cover-up.
You point the finger at Payne in having to do with Maddie’s death (I recall you being the first to do that in Joana’s) but have minimised all possibility of all this being the lid being kept on a a paedo crime committed by Payne.
He was identified by Yvonne Martin as paedo, or involved in paedo processes in UK. He was very rude to her.
The Gaspars identify clearly paedo behaviours in his conversation with Gerry when talking about Maddie.
Gerry has an empty CATS files.
He bathed other people’s little children during the holiday where the Gaspars were present. He bathed Gaspars’ daughter, for example.
He was the last person to see Maddie alive and describes the situation in very strange terms of white angels and all so peaceful.
There are also other things that make me thing that this is all about paedophilia:
He is the one that suggests and organises the holiday and he is the one that says who stays in what apartment
He is the one that doesn’t need to check his children because he has a baby monitor that works great distances and because of this is the only male of the group who doesn’t leave the dinner table.
He is the one who filmed that moment with Gerry swearing in front of all including children on an airport bus and I think he was the one who uploaded the video on YouTube.
He was the one that was heard in the rogatory statements after the Portuguese cops had left the UK. All others were heard when they were there. Also I think he says that the right forum is not to be there answering the rogatory questions.
I think all this points much more to paedophilia than to swinging. So why call it a Stink Bomb like you have?”Okay, just a quick comment on the above post. I may not agree with all of it, however I think it is clear, concise, articulate and pertinent. He (and I am using 'he' as a default; might just as easily be 'she') is rightly questioning Textusa's dismissive attitude to anyone who disagrees with her and should be applauded.
Anyway - moving on.......
So you are actually suggesting that a man who thinks it's okay to have sex with an 11 year old is disgusted by a man who thinks it's okay to have sex with a 10 year old? You are literally clueless
We have demonstrated why we believe that the Ocean Club is involved by it having handed over to the PJ a series of papers, under the designation of “Tapas Reservation Sheets”which are absolutely meaningless besides being a frustrated attempt to prove that the Tapas dinners took place.
They are just booking sheets for fucks sake. The mad bitch wrote an entire column analysing the fact that one of them carried a doodle in the corner
The fact that those “Tapas Reservation Sheets” are phoney makes all guests whose names are on them to be involved in the cover-up.
Like the one you claimed was a fake without noticing it was for the following week?
The fact that the there was no BRT and so no T9 Tapas dinners, proves that those who state seeing the group sitting around a big round table are lying, namely the Quiz Mistress and Jez Wilkins.
The Quiz Mistress who hosts, twice a week, a very popular British contest that only she remembers.
We have shown how Mrs Fenn’s “Maddie’s crying episode” is more than questionable.
We have demonstrated why we believe that the invention of Pimpleman, a pivotal character in 2009 whose use has been outlasted by the Black Hats (BH) themselves. He was materialised by Derek Flack, TS (a minor who is NOT responsible for the lies she was told to tell) and JW in stories which we showed had more holes in them than a Swiss cheese.
We have shown how the Tapas staff were conveniently singing from the same hymn sheet less than 24 hours after Madeleine disappeared.
So if there are discrepancies, it's highly suspicious, and if there aren't discrepancies, it's a conspiracy. Seems fair
It’s this melting pot that crosses all statuses and professions involving guests, Ocean Club management, Ocean Club workers and ex-Pats that rules out, in our opinion, paedophilia, or to be more precise, nepiophilia, in Maddie's case.
Whatever could possibly motivate these people in covering-up for a murderous infant-rapist?
The fact that there a not only VHLCU and HLCU but also MLCU, LLCU and VLLCU, indicate, to us, that nepiophilia is in no way related with Maddie’s death.
I meant it, Death penalty. No exceptions.
No way would so many people let themselves be involved in protecting a murderous-infant rapist.
There’s no secret big enough or powerful enough to enable that.
Absolutely fucking mental.
|No, that's a wheelbarrow|
To reiterate, Textusa's thinking goes like this
Of course, the truth is some retired copper mentioned swinging, Textusa latched on to it, and can't let go.
In just the same way she suggested there were no tapas dinners and now she can't let go.
The fundamental primary problem is that she isn't very good at analysing information. The secondary problem is that she is a fucking nutcase
The irony is that she states.....
''No way would so many people let themselves be involved in protecting a murderous-infant rapist''.......seemingly oblivious to the fact that she claims those same people would and indeed did unquestioningly, and to a man, protect a violent infant murderer .