In yet another post where she takes the statement, applies arrows, bows and whistles before declaring it a work of fiction, she says the following
''Either REDACTED didn’t have an ear infection and went to school that day and didn’t see Pimpleman as she say she does, or she did have an ear infection painful enough to stop her from going to school and so didn’t see Pimpleman because she wouldn't have been able to leave her house at the time and manner she describes she does.(The child described staying off school with earache and later going out to the shops to pick up some medicinal items)It’s as simple as that.Just out of curiosity, it would be very interesting to have the Police ask the REDACTED School REDACTED for the register of this particular absence, as well as its justification, and verify if REDACTED did indeed miss school on May 2nd 2007. Just a suggestion.But let’s pretend we’re fooled by the 11 yr old girl.''
The purpose of her comments seems to be three-fold
To try to convince her followers that the statement was untrue
To get as close as possible to identifying the child, without identifying her. I have redacted her initials and the full name of the school she attended, which Textusa included in the post.
To scare the child, by suggesting the involvement of the police